Fermented Wheat Germ Extract as a Redox Modulator: Alleviating
Endotoxin-Triggered Oxidative Stress in Primary Cultured
Rat Hepatocytes
However, in case of noninflamed hepatocytes, considering the results of
glutathione peroxidase activity, the application of the product did not result in severe oxidative distress. In accordance with the
abovementioned findings, FWGE as a redox modulator, applied in the appropriate concentration, can serve as a promising
candidate in the supplementary therapy of patients suffering from various inflammatory diseases, decreasing the free radical
generation, thus avoiding the occurrence of cytotoxic effects.
However, in case of noninflamed hepatocytes, considering the results of
glutathione peroxidase activity, the application of the product did not result in severe oxidative distress. In accordance with the
abovementioned findings, FWGE as a redox modulator, applied in the appropriate concentration, can serve as a promising
candidate in the supplementary therapy of patients suffering from various inflammatory diseases, decreasing the free radical
generation, thus avoiding the occurrence of cytotoxic effects.
1. Introduction
Based on its various beneficial biological effects, fermented
wheat germ extract (FWGE) is successfully used in human
medicine, mainly in the supportive therapy of people suffering from cancer. Bioactive compounds—most importantly
different benzoquinone derivates—found in FWGE provide
significant anticancer effects by influencing several cellular
molecular mechanisms [1]. The FWGE stimulates the
immune response against tumor cells by decreasing the
MHC-I expression in the cell membrane and rendering cancer cells more effectively be recognized by natural killer (NK)
cells [1]. In addition, FWGE increases tumor necrosis factor
α (TNFα) production by macrophages, leading to improved
immune response towards tumor cells, inhibition of angiogenesis, and increased apoptosis of the target cells [2]. Furthermore, FWGE is also able to increase interleukin 1α (IL1α), IL-2, IL-5, and IL-6 levels [3], which are considered to
be among the main regulatory molecules of the inflammatory
response. Beyond its immunomodulatory effects, FWGE can enhance oxidative stress in tumor cells, inducing cell destruction caused by the produced free radicals [4].
2. Materials and Methods
All reagents used in the study were purchased from SigmaAldrich (Darmstadt, Germany), except when otherwise specified. Animal procedures described hereinafter were performed in strict accordance with the national and
international law along with institutional guidelines and were
confirmed by the Local Animal Welfare Committee of the
University of Veterinary Medicine, Budapest, and by the
Government Office of Pest County, Food Chain Safety, Plant
Protection, and Soil Conservation Directorate, Budapest,
Hungary.
2.1. Cell Isolation and Culturing Conditions. Isolation and
culturing of primary rat hepatocytes were carried out based
on our formerly developed and published method [15].
Briefly, hepatocyte isolation was performed using 8-weekold Wistar rats (approx. 200-250 g). Animals were kept and
fed according to the actual Hungarian and European animal
welfare laws. After carbon dioxide narcosis, median laparotomy was performed followed by the cannulation of the vena
portae and the thoracic section of the vena cava caudalis. The
liver was flushed and exsanguinated through the portal system, using different buffers and multistep perfusion. In order
to recirculate the buffers, the effusing amount of the solutions
was collected via the vena cava caudalis.
2.2. Treatments of Cultured Cells. After 24 h, culturing cells
were treated using cell culture media supplemented with 0
(control) or 10 μg/mL Salmonella enterica serovar. Typhimurium derived lipopolysaccharide (LPS) for 2 and 8 h incubation time. Further, in both of the control and LPSchallenged cultures, subgroups were prepared using 0.1%
and 1% FWGE prepared from Immunovet®, silymarin
(50 μg/mL), or ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA, 200 μg/mL)
containing cell culture medium. In the latter two cases, cultures were treated with proved hepatoprotective and antioxidant substances.
To gain the FWGE working solutions (Immunovet®), 1 g
of FWGE granules was homogenized using a mortar until a
fine powder was received and dissolved in 10 mL sterile phosphate buffered saline (PBS) solution. The gained stock solution (100 mg/mL; 10%) was filtered in different steps, using
gauze sheets (3 layers, 2 times filtering), a cell strainer
(70 μm pore size), and a sterile filter (0.22 μm pore size) in
the end (Merck Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA). Stock solution (10%) was diluted with PBS to 1% and 0.1%
concentrations.
2.3. Measurements of Cellular Metabolic Activity,
Extracellular H2O2 and Malondialdehyde Concentrations,
and Glutathione Peroxidase Activity. Following the treat-ments, metabolic activity of cells cultured on 96-well plates
was checked using CCK-8 assay (Dojindo, Rockville, USA),
monitoring the total amount of NADH+H+ produced in
the cellular catabolic reactions, successfully reflecting also
to the potential cytotoxic effects. According to the manufacturer’s instructions, 10 μL CCK-8 reagent and 100 μL Williams’ Medium E were added to the cultured cells, and after
2 h of incubation at 37°
C, the absorbance was measured at
450 nm with a Multiskan GO 3.2 reader (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).
Extracellular H2O2 concentration was detected in the culture medium using the fluorimetric Amplex Red method
(Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). After
30 min incubation of 50 μL freshly prepared, Amplex Red
(100 μM) and HRP (0.2 U/mL) containing working solution
with 50 μL culture medium at room temperature (21°
C),
fluorescence (λex = 560 nm; λem = 590 nm) was detected
using a Victor X2 2030 fluorometer (Perkin Elmer, Waltham,
MA, USA).
2.4. Statistics. All the data analysis was performed using the R
3.5.3. software (GNU General Public License, Free Software
Foundation, Boston, MA, USA). On both of 96- and 6-well plates, six wells were included in one treatment group. Normal distribution and homogeneity of variance were checked
by Shapiro-Wilk test and Levene’s test, respectively. Differences between various groups were assessed using one-way
analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s post hoc tests
for pairwise comparisons. Results were assessed as the
mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Differences were
assumed significant at P < 0:05. Results of the FWGE, silymarin, and UDCA treated groups were compared to the
respective control groups (LPS free or LPS supplemented
control groups). The effects of LPS supplementation were
considered as main effect compared to the control groups
without LPS treatment.
section_15