Immune System


Fermented Wheat Germ Extract as a Redox Modulator: Alleviating

Endotoxin-Triggered Oxidative Stress in Primary Cultured

Rat Hepatocytes

 However, in case of noninflamed hepatocytes, considering the results of

glutathione peroxidase activity, the application of the product did not result in severe oxidative distress. In accordance with the

abovementioned findings, FWGE as a redox modulator, applied in the appropriate concentration, can serve as a promising

candidate in the supplementary therapy of patients suffering from various inflammatory diseases, decreasing the free radical

generation, thus avoiding the occurrence of cytotoxic effects.

 However, in case of noninflamed hepatocytes, considering the results of

glutathione peroxidase activity, the application of the product did not result in severe oxidative distress. In accordance with the

abovementioned findings, FWGE as a redox modulator, applied in the appropriate concentration, can serve as a promising

candidate in the supplementary therapy of patients suffering from various inflammatory diseases, decreasing the free radical

generation, thus avoiding the occurrence of cytotoxic effects.

Fermented Wheat Germ Extract as a Redox Modulator: Alleviating

 1. Introduction

Based on its various beneficial biological effects, fermented

wheat germ extract (FWGE) is successfully used in human

medicine, mainly in the supportive therapy of people suffering from cancer. Bioactive compounds—most importantly

different benzoquinone derivates—found in FWGE provide

significant anticancer effects by influencing several cellular

molecular mechanisms [1]. The FWGE stimulates the

immune response against tumor cells by decreasing the

MHC-I expression in the cell membrane and rendering cancer cells more effectively be recognized by natural killer (NK)

cells [1]. In addition, FWGE increases tumor necrosis factor

α (TNFα) production by macrophages, leading to improved

immune response towards tumor cells, inhibition of angiogenesis, and increased apoptosis of the target cells [2]. Furthermore, FWGE is also able to increase interleukin 1α (IL1α), IL-2, IL-5, and IL-6 levels [3], which are considered to

be among the main regulatory molecules of the inflammatory

response. Beyond its immunomodulatory effects, FWGE can enhance oxidative stress in tumor cells, inducing cell destruction caused by the produced free radicals [4].

2. Materials and Methods

All reagents used in the study were purchased from SigmaAldrich (Darmstadt, Germany), except when otherwise specified. Animal procedures described hereinafter were performed in strict accordance with the national and

international law along with institutional guidelines and were

confirmed by the Local Animal Welfare Committee of the

University of Veterinary Medicine, Budapest, and by the

Government Office of Pest County, Food Chain Safety, Plant

Protection, and Soil Conservation Directorate, Budapest,

Hungary.

2.1. Cell Isolation and Culturing Conditions. Isolation and

culturing of primary rat hepatocytes were carried out based

on our formerly developed and published method [15].

Briefly, hepatocyte isolation was performed using 8-weekold Wistar rats (approx. 200-250 g). Animals were kept and

fed according to the actual Hungarian and European animal

welfare laws. After carbon dioxide narcosis, median laparotomy was performed followed by the cannulation of the vena

portae and the thoracic section of the vena cava caudalis. The

liver was flushed and exsanguinated through the portal system, using different buffers and multistep perfusion. In order

to recirculate the buffers, the effusing amount of the solutions

was collected via the vena cava caudalis.

2.2. Treatments of Cultured Cells. After 24 h, culturing cells

were treated using cell culture media supplemented with 0

(control) or 10 μg/mL Salmonella enterica serovar. Typhimurium derived lipopolysaccharide (LPS) for 2 and 8 h incubation time. Further, in both of the control and LPSchallenged cultures, subgroups were prepared using 0.1%

and 1% FWGE prepared from Immunovet®, silymarin

(50 μg/mL), or ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA, 200 μg/mL)

containing cell culture medium. In the latter two cases, cultures were treated with proved hepatoprotective and antioxidant substances.

To gain the FWGE working solutions (Immunovet®), 1 g

of FWGE granules was homogenized using a mortar until a

fine powder was received and dissolved in 10 mL sterile phosphate buffered saline (PBS) solution. The gained stock solution (100 mg/mL; 10%) was filtered in different steps, using

gauze sheets (3 layers, 2 times filtering), a cell strainer

(70 μm pore size), and a sterile filter (0.22 μm pore size) in

the end (Merck Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA). Stock solution (10%) was diluted with PBS to 1% and 0.1%

concentrations.

2.3. Measurements of Cellular Metabolic Activity,

Extracellular H2O2 and Malondialdehyde Concentrations,

and Glutathione Peroxidase Activity. Following the treat-ments, metabolic activity of cells cultured on 96-well plates

was checked using CCK-8 assay (Dojindo, Rockville, USA),

monitoring the total amount of NADH+H+ produced in

the cellular catabolic reactions, successfully reflecting also

to the potential cytotoxic effects. According to the manufacturer’s instructions, 10 μL CCK-8 reagent and 100 μL Williams’ Medium E were added to the cultured cells, and after

2 h of incubation at 37°

C, the absorbance was measured at

450 nm with a Multiskan GO 3.2 reader (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).

Extracellular H2O2 concentration was detected in the culture medium using the fluorimetric Amplex Red method

(Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). After

30 min incubation of 50 μL freshly prepared, Amplex Red

(100 μM) and HRP (0.2 U/mL) containing working solution

with 50 μL culture medium at room temperature (21°

C),

fluorescence (λex = 560 nm; λem = 590 nm) was detected

using a Victor X2 2030 fluorometer (Perkin Elmer, Waltham,

MA, USA).

2.4. Statistics. All the data analysis was performed using the R

3.5.3. software (GNU General Public License, Free Software

Foundation, Boston, MA, USA). On both of 96- and 6-well plates, six wells were included in one treatment group. Normal distribution and homogeneity of variance were checked

by Shapiro-Wilk test and Levene’s test, respectively. Differences between various groups were assessed using one-way

analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s post hoc tests

for pairwise comparisons. Results were assessed as the

mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Differences were

assumed significant at P < 0:05. Results of the FWGE, silymarin, and UDCA treated groups were compared to the

respective control groups (LPS free or LPS supplemented

control groups). The effects of LPS supplementation were

considered as main effect compared to the control groups

without LPS treatment.

section_15

Share by: